ETHICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE DELAY OF DEATH PENALTY IN NIGERIA

Abstract

This research work examines the ethical and legal implications of delay in the execution of death penalty in Nigeria and the scope of death penalty in Nigeria. It further examines the laws that are used in cases of death penalty in Nigeria. This research� observes� that there is no single method of execution of a capital offender adopted by Nigeria that is remotely painless. The predominant method of execution of death sentence in Nigeria is hanging. Death by firing squad was also reserved for those who are convicted for armed robbery and also for coupists, under the Military Regimes. Stoning and crucifixion are also applicable as methods of execution under the Shariah Penal Codes in some of the Northern States of Nigeria. However, these methods have been widely acclaimed to be crude and inhumane. It also finds that the much flaunted modern methods of execution, like electrocution, lethal injection etc, are not remotely painless, as they inflict excruciating pains on the capital offender. There is none where the death is instantaneous. The research recommends that the legal system should undergo regular reviews to ensure that death penalty laws remain fair, just, and in line with evolving societal values. This research concludes that the increased concern about the death penalty in Nigeria, is partly as a result of the death penalty being imposed after trials that do not conform to fair trial standards. Capital offenders are kept long in detention without arraignment, and occasionally, defendants lack access to legal assistance during trials.

Identifiers

Resource ID

urn:uuid:102919ca-7570-4281-9614-efe2fb52e00b